PDA

View Full Version : Karl Rove--Right on!


markyj987
06-24-2005, 07:31 AM
So, the left wants Karl Rove fired for the remarks he made (see article below--I've even highlighted the key things he said in red for the article skimmers here...lol)

Sadly, the lefts reaction to 9/11 was JUST as he says. Sure, we were all united that day, but a few weeks later, liberal controlled acadamia and mass media called one of their favorite plays: Let's try to understand why they hate us. It's America's fault.

9/12 wasn't a day for quiet reflection. It was a day we began to plan the destruction of our enemies--and that was the right thing to do. Anyone who thinks trying to understand the enemy is wasting their time. It's pretty darn simple--they want to kill us because we are Americans.

I urge EVERY SINGLE ONE of you to do all you can to reach out to our troops and let them know that you SUPPORT THEM. Let them know that Dick Durbin was NOT speaking on behalf of the American people...but on behalf of a twisted liberal agenda.

What Durbin said SHOULD tick off everybody--not just conservatives. And what Karl Rove said should only anger the liberals who subscribe to the blame America mentality.

Karl Rove should be given a medal for what he said--not be pressured to resign. Fortunately, I think President Bush has the guts to stand by Rove's comments. It should be pretty easy for him to do that--because he's right!

-------------
June 23, 2005

Rove Criticizes Liberals on 9/11

By PATRICK D. HEALY

Karl Rove came to the heart of Manhattan last night to rhapsodize about the decline of liberalism in politics, saying Democrats responded weakly to Sept. 11 and had placed American troops in greater danger by criticizing their actions.

<font color="red">"Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 in the attacks and prepared for war; liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers,"</font> Mr. Rove, the senior political adviser to President Bush, said at a fund-raiser in Midtown for the Conservative Party of New York State.

Citing calls by progressive groups to respond carefully to the attacks, Mr. Rove said to the applause of several hundred audience members, "I don't know about you, but moderation and restraint is not what I felt when I watched the twin towers crumble to the ground, a side of the Pentagon destroyed, and almost 3,000 of our fellow citizens perish in flames and rubble."

Told of Mr. Rove's remarks, Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, replied: "In New York, where everyone unified after 9/11, the last thing we need is somebody who seeks to divide us for political purposes."

Mr. Rove also said American armed forces overseas were in more jeopardy as a result of remarks last week by Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, who compared American mistreatment of detainees to the acts of "Nazis, Soviets in their gulags, or some mad regime - Pol Pot or others."

"Has there ever been a more revealing moment this year?" Mr. Rove asked. <font color="red">"Let me just put this in fairly simple terms: Al Jazeera now broadcasts the words of Senator Durbin to the Mideast, certainly putting our troops in greater danger.</font> No more needs to be said about the motives of liberals."

Gov. George E. Pataki of New York, speaking after Mr. Rove, also touched on the Sept. 11 attacks. He promised that the proposed Freedom Tower, the new building at ground zero, would retain patriotic touches in its architecture, like a height of 1,776 feet, despite the concerns of some observers who fear that it would become a target for terrorists.

"We're going to have a Freedom Tower that soars 1,776 feet high, symbolizing our independence," Mr. Pataki said. As for the memorial, he said: "No one is going to turn it into something that is a negative statement about America and our belief in freedom, so long as I am governor of this state."

Speaking to reporters afterward, Mr. Pataki disclosed that he did not plan to reveal in the coming days if he will seek a fourth term, contrary to previous statements that he would make an announcement after the State Legislature adjourned today.

"I'm going to evaluate the bills that the Legislature has passed at the end of the session and then make a decision at the appropriate time, but not in the next couple of weeks," Mr. Pataki said.
-------------
<font color="red"> </font>

Texan_Til_I_Die
06-24-2005, 09:24 AM
Ah yes, spoken like a TRUE TEXAN. Carry on Brother Rove!

Texan_Til_I_Die
06-24-2005, 01:03 PM
WASHINGTON (AP) - A White House official said Friday the administration finds it "somewhat puzzling" that Democrats are demanding presidential adviser Karl Rove's apology or resignation for implying that liberals are soft on terrorism.

"I think Karl was very specific, very accurate, in who he was pointing out," communications director Dan Bartlett said. "It's touched a chord with these Democrats. I'm not sure why."

http://www.realtree.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif http://www.realtree.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif http://www.realtree.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif ...I can tell you why. The truth hurts! And notice that he said LIBERALS, not Democrats, LIBERALS!!! But who do you think ran to the nearest microphone and started demanding he resign? Chuck Schumer, Harry Reid, and of course Hillary (I wanna be a moderate, but I can't let go of my liberalism) Clinton.

Andrea
06-24-2005, 01:04 PM
Rove for President 2008. http://www.realtree.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif http://www.realtree.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif http://www.realtree.com/forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif

slugshooter
06-24-2005, 01:10 PM
I don't like Karl Rove, not surprising huh, mainly because I believe he is the one pulling the puppet strings on you know who. But I agree with his comments for the most part. I remember after 9/11, when I was supposed to be in New York City that day delivering a load a couple miles from the WTC, I remember sitting on the Woodrow Wilson Bridge over the Potomac River and watching all **** break loose and the billowing black smoke from the Pentagon, and I remember thinking to myself how I wanted to bomb the living **** out of whoever was responsible. Unfortunately the man responsible is still on the loose for who knows how long, but there is a time for trying to understand and a time for action, to fight your enemy, you must know and understand your enemy, so I see nothing wrong with trying to understand, but indictments are no good when the person is half a world away. I disagree with Dick Durbins comments also, comparing Gitmo to a Gulag or Nazi concentration camp is out of line, hopefully things never get that bad, we as Americans should be better than that, but there are issues that need to be dealt with at Gitmo and other prisons where suspected terrorists are being held.

oldksnarc
06-24-2005, 07:50 PM
It's amazing how we conservatives are supposed to be tolerant of Howard Dean and his spewing forth all sorts of trash about conservatives. But, when a conservative does the same thing they raise holy ****.

I told my nephew, when he came back from Iraq, to understand that as long as politicians were involved, Iraq was eventually going to end up like Vietnam and to never be ashamed of having responded to the call to service. Like Vietnam, the politicians are politicizing the war on terror and, while most politicians and liberals profess support for the troops, they undermine what the troops and the armed services are doing and make unreasonable demands on the armed services.

If there are problems they need to be addressed. But, otherwise, let them do their job. Even if the Koran was flushed down the toilet in an attempt to have a psychological effect on the prisoners for interrogation purposes - so what? Boo-hoo. How many Bibles and Flags have been burned by them to demoralize us?

Say what you will about President Bush, but if it wasn't for President Bush we wouldn't be in this war. Hooray for him. It's much better than previous liberal responses of blowing holes in the desert with Cruise missiles in response to terrorist bombings and calling that an appropriate response. Lip service and indictments don't amount to an eye for an eye.

slugshooter
06-24-2005, 11:07 PM
Come to think of it, remembering back to the days and weeks after 9/11, this country was more united than ever, including the congress, who can forget the photo op on the steps of the capitol building when the members of congress sang God Bless America. Was it sincere, yes, I believe it was, congress and America was united, partisanship was almost like a foreign word. It wasn't until GW Bush launched his attack on Iraq that the partisan divisions began to reemerge.