I heard an interesting discussion on the radio this morning. They raised this question:
Given that if John Kerry loses in November, Hilary Clinton will be the most likely Democrat nominee in 2008.
If Kerry wins, Clinton wouldn't have a realistic opportunity to run until 2012--and by then, hopefully she'll have been forgotten..LOL.
Would you rather tolerate John Kerry for four years...
Or face the fact that Clinton could realistically win in 2008?
Most of the callers said they'd take Bush now...and gamble in 2008. I have to agree, because I think Kerry could mess things up in a bad, bad way over a four-year term.
I just thought it was an interesting question and wanted to pass it along.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
I think he'll screw things up so bad that Clinton could get the nod or Kerry wouldn't seek re-election.




Bookmarks