Here is my reply...please give us more detail on the "research". As in, did you do it, if so what sources, what criteria were used, etc. If you just took it from some website, please reference that website.
Welcome to the hunting forum. Participate in member hunting forums, member blogs, and hunting pro blogs. The hunting forum is also the place to see Team Realtree photos and add your own photos.
We hope you’ll visit often! Why not bookmark this hunting forum page right now and share the link with a friend!
Here is my reply...please give us more detail on the "research". As in, did you do it, if so what sources, what criteria were used, etc. If you just took it from some website, please reference that website.
Team Franken? And you expect an unbiased opinion? That's funny.
I really liked the part where you said we should just believe you without any refrences. I don't think you've earned that kind of respect around here.
Hahaha, don't get your underwear in a wad, i simply asked about your sources. When you present something as fact, it is helpful to know where it is coming from before you form a judgement on its validity.
BIGBUCKSHOOTER, why do you have to sound so mad and upset and like you are looking for an arguement. Maybe you don't respect Racksie, but a lot of us do, including me. He has been an outstanding member here for almost 5 years, you've been here just 6 months. Guys here have come to know him quite well. You won't win the respect arguement like that. We members here are not the media on this forum and best as I remember no one here has ever said anything about this stuff recently enough to bring about this arguement (and sarcastic sounding I may add). Maybe I missed it though.
I'm sure there are some members here that may agree with you, I am not one of them and neither are those that have responded so far. They are simply wondering what your research consisted of and it looks more like you want to argue than explain your research and findings. I am sure most guys here would be interested in seeing this. Take a few minutes and tell us how you came to determine this, I am curious myself.
I don't want your respect, BBS. I don't need it. I'd rather not have it.
1. Durbin vs. Rove
2. Clinton vs. Gingrich
3. Media Bias Basics
4. That Liberal Media
[ QUOTE ]
I don't want your respect, BBS. I don't need it. I'd rather not have it
[/ QUOTE ]
good thing we dont all sound like a bunch of kids lol. ah ha ha ah. man this is my favorite part of the forum. im only 15 and its so funny to watch all you guys act like big babies. you argue over the stupidest stuff. lol man o man![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't want your respect, BBS. I don't need it. I'd rather not have it
[/ QUOTE ]
good thing we dont all sound like a bunch of kids lol. ah ha ha ah. man this is my favorite part of the forum. im only 15 and its so funny to watch all you guys act like big babies. you argue over the stupidest stuff. lol man o man![]()
[/ QUOTE ]
Way to put me in my place, sport. Now I'm going to cry.
[ QUOTE ]
Way to put me in my place, sport. Now I'm going to cry.
[/ QUOTE ]
#1 my name is not sport "racksie".
#2 it was a freakin joke. so before you go cry try and bump your maturity up to the level of about my 10 year old sister.
#3 it was directed at everybody in the forum, i just used your quote as an example, show me where i said racksie you act like a kid. show me exactly where i said that because thats exactly what i thought i didnt. good call on that one.![]()
I haven't done any research. I just observed for the last 52 years
The News Media is interested in one thing....ratings !!. They all want the biggest audience they can get. That's how they make their money and that's also how they make their decissions on how to report the news.. They swing like a pendulum in the ever changing wind, as far as taking sides here or there. It's the masses they want to please. It's good for business.
The very fact that they are like a pendulum in the wind, is what makes them have a liberal bias, because that is the same principle that makes a liberal, a Liberal. Pendulums in the wind, who would rather fall for everything than stand for something.![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Way to put me in my place, sport. Now I'm going to cry.
[/ QUOTE ]
#1 my name is not sport "racksie".
#2 it was a freakin joke. so before you go cry try and bump your maturity up to the level of about my 10 year old sister.
#3 it was directed at everybody in the forum, i just used your quote as an example, show me where i said racksie you act like a kid. show me exactly where i said that because thats exactly what i thought i didnt. good call on that one.![]()
[/ QUOTE ]
#1 I call kids sport when I don't know their name.
#2 My comment was obviously as much a joke as yours. And as poorly constructed as yours.
#3 If the comment wasn't directed at me, don't quote me. It may not have been directly stated, but it was implied. Why comment in the political forum if you have nothing to say? I'm sure there's 20 "which bow" or "which gun" posts to read.
do I lock this post now or wait 10 minutes, just for the fun of it ??![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Why comment in the political forum if you have nothing to say
[/ QUOTE ]
because i can and i dont give what part of the forum it is.i can talk about politics in this post if i want,but i dnt have to. and no it was not implied. if i had implied it then it would have really been directed at you but not directly stated. so now that i put all those questions to shame, got anymore?
oh bye the way, using a quote that someone said does not mean that it was implied or directed at them. i used a quote from george washington in my worl history midterm. does that mean tht i was talking to him? yeah it doesnt.
sorry for hijacking this thread but when hes gonna tske a post that i was kiding around in and make sarcastic remarks, i aint just gonna "let it fly"
Or we could take 2 posts that we both were in kidding and get a thread locked over it. Don't assume that I'm being serious because I'm not using smilies. Anytime I call someone 'sport' chances are I'm not being serious.
Anyway. How 'bout we get back on topic.. What was the topic again? OH yeah.. Mathews or Hoyt?
Bookmarks