Realtree Forums

Hunting Forum

Welcome to the hunting forum. Participate in member hunting forums, member blogs, and hunting pro blogs. The hunting forum is also the place to see Team Realtree photos and add your own photos.

We hope you’ll visit often! Why not bookmark this hunting forum page right now and share the link with a friend!

Hunting Forum | Realtree ® - Powered by vBulletin
Sign in with

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Texan_Til_I_Die's Avatar
    Texan_Til_I_Die is offline Monster Buck
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    6,874
    Blog Entries
    9

    Default State\'s Right vs. Individual Rights

    The threads on abortion, the death penalty and most recently interracial relationships have really gone off well (with the exception of all of those entries that Buckee deleted before I could read them!). In that same spirit, what do ya’ll think about the issue of state’s rights and concealed carry? Should other states be required to recognize my license? There is a beginning grass-roots movement to institute a nationwide reciprocity agreement that would require all states to recognize and honor any state’s licenses, even in those states where owning a handgun is virtually impossible. I’m sure that there would have to be some minimum standards established or perhaps even a national concealed carry license. What do you think – good idea or bad idea?

    I’m licensed to carry a concealed handgun in Texas by our state police. The certification consists of several hours of classroom instruction followed by a written test over that material. Then you must pass a proficiency test at the range by demonstrating proper safety skills and by shooting a minimum score in a live fire exercise. If you want to carry a semi-auto handgun, then you must qualify with a semi-auto. Currently my Texas license is also recognized in Colorado, Montana, Georgia, Mississippi, Utah, Idaho, North Carolina, Wyoming, Kentucky, Tennessee, Florida, Arizona, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Arkansas. That’s 16 (counting Texas) out of 50 states. Do those other 34 states and the District of Columbia have the authority to tell me that I must relinquish my right to self defense if I travel to or through their state? Something tells me that I might have more of a need for protection when visiting New York, Chicago or Los Angeles than I would in Missoula, Boise or Laramie.

    I’ve always been a big “state’s rights” type of person, but in this case I believe that if its done properly, a national right to carry law would be the best solution. My reasoning is that there are some rights that should be universal, regardless of what some state legislature or governor may say, and the right of self defense is one of those!

  2. #2
    fisherguy is offline Monster Buck
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    ontario canada
    Posts
    3,828

    Default Re: State\'s Right vs. Individual Rights

    Nope, each state has its own laws on the issue. If you are licenced, you should be able to carry in any state with concealed carry laws. In those without the concealed carry laws you should not be able to. Otherwise what is the point in allowing states to make their own laws if it will only apply to some people?

  3. #3
    carbonhunter is offline Monster Buck
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Des Moines, Iowa
    Posts
    2,991

    Default Re: State\'s Right vs. Individual Rights

    I didnt know you had to be a citizen to carry here in Ohio? I dont see a issue with it, all though it would depend on the person. I guess id expect more rigerous testing for the said individuals..............Do you trust Micheal Moores bodyguards to carry over borders(or on a plane???..LOL)

    I think far and away most who carry are good people just trying to either A. defend themselves or B. defend someone in grave danger.

  4. #4
    Norm Sauceman's Avatar
    Norm Sauceman is offline Monster Buck
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Cookeville, Tennessee
    Posts
    4,110

    Default Re: State\'s Right vs. Individual Rights

    The states verify through the FBI. I am sure if someone checks out well in one state, it should be good enough for the rest of the states. If the Federal Government OK's the person then the State verifys that person is legal and law abiding then I think ALL states should recognize it..

  5. #5
    OJR's Avatar
    OJR
    OJR is offline Monster Buck
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    West of the Snake River
    Posts
    16,669

    Default Re: State\'s Right vs. Individual Rights

    I believe that all states should recognize the right to carry! If you are licensed in one state, it should be good in all 50!

    It is very seldom that I go against states rights, but this is an exception!

  6. #6
    ParrotHead is offline Monster Buck
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    2,434

    Default Re: State\'s Right vs. Individual Rights

    The last time the states started claiming hey had rights - Lincoln sent the Calvary down here and burned everything down!

    As for a national right to carry - are you willing to enter into a "national registry" or database? That's the only way it's possible to get passed and I for one don't think it's a good idea - just like I don't think the national id is a good idea.

  7. #7
    Norm Sauceman's Avatar
    Norm Sauceman is offline Monster Buck
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Cookeville, Tennessee
    Posts
    4,110

    Default Re: State\'s Right vs. Individual Rights

    Yes I am willing to be put on a National register stating I am legal to carry a concealed firearm.

  8. #8
    oldksnarc's Avatar
    oldksnarc is offline 10-Pointer
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    NW Kansas
    Posts
    1,090

    Default Re: State\'s Right vs. Individual Rights

    I'm not opposed to reciprocity if there is a minimum standard of qualification, i.e. background, training, and so forth. The feds just adopted a national carry for law enforcement officers. Boy was it confusing before.

  9. #9
    wtnhunt's Avatar
    wtnhunt is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    West Tennessee
    Posts
    59,528
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default Re: State\'s Right vs. Individual Rights

    Think there should be laws of reciprocity in regards to this as well. IMHO should be a federal right to carry and that give you the right in all states.

  10. #10
    horst is offline Monster Buck
    Join Date
    Mar 2001
    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    5,602

    Default Re: State\'s Right vs. Individual Rights

    I really dont see what the problem would be.For instance I have to pass a background check here to buy a shotgun.Id pass the same check in any of the other 49 states.How many times do yo have to be checked over before your considered safe to carry a weapon?Its the same thing with a concealed weapon, somewhere, somebody checked you out real closely before they issued you a permit for that weapon or you wouldnt be carrying it, it shouldnt matter where it was done.

Similar Threads

  1. Your State's Rules and regs book
    By Squirrelhunter91 in forum Deer Hunting
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 01-29-2007, 07:54 PM
  2. U.N. & OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS
    By LifeNRA in forum Politics
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-16-2006, 11:55 PM
  3. Your Second Amendment Rights...
    By HarvDog in forum Lounge
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-23-2006, 07:59 PM
  4. Im one sick individual!
    By Jeramie in forum Lounge
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-08-2005, 01:20 AM
  5. Bill of Non-Rights
    By 007hunter in forum Lounge
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-05-2005, 09:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts